Thursday, November 28, 2019

Saddam Hussein Essays - Politics Of Iraq, , Term Papers

Saddam Hussein Saddam Hussein, an Iraqi political leader, was born to a poor Arab family on April 28, 1937. Hussein studied law in Egypt after his attempt to assassinate the premier of Iraq, Abdul Karim Kassem, in 1959. In the summer of 1968, the Baath party returned to power and named Hussein as deputy chairman of the Revolutionary Command Council. Hussein has been described by many as the most powerful person in Iraq because of his intimidation of enemies, careful control of his political power, and his military purges. Saddam finally gained control of the Iraq presidency in 1979. His many goals as President included attempting to increase industrial production, reorganizing government policies in agriculture, and improving education and the status of women. Hussein first began a successful development program of Iraq's huge petroleum resources. However, this development and economic and social advances were at risk when Iraq went to war with Iran from 1980 to 1988. Hussein started this war to control Arab-inhabited areas and especially for oil resources. Hussein is also known as a ruthless leader who used chemical weapons on Kurdish people seeking freedom in the 1980's. In August, 1990, Hussein invaded and annexed Kuwait for violating oil production laws set by the Organization of Petroleum Exports Countries(OPEC). (Kuwait had lowered the price of oil.) The Iraqi forces killed many Kuwaiti people and stole or destroyed much property. Hussein apparently wanted to use Kuwait's vast oil resources to help Iraq's economy. Many people believed that Iraq would next invade neighboring countries such as Saudi Arabia. Some of the countries that opposed Iraq's invasion and that sent forces to this region were the United States, Canada, and several Arab and Western European nations. These countries formed an allied military coalition that caused a worldwide embargo against Iraq. The United Nations Security Council condemned Iraq's occupation and approved the use of military force on Iraq if their troops did not withdraw from Kuwait by January 15, 1991. Hussein ignored this demand and refused to withdraw. The consequence of this decision was to go to war. On January 16, 1991, the allies bombed military targets in Iraq and Kuwait. Iraq, in return, launched missiles against Saudi Arabia and Israel. The U.S.-led military coalition drove Iraq's armies out of Kuwait. This war, called the Persian Gulf War, lasted only six weeks. On April 11, 1991, the U.N. Security Council made Iraq promise to pay Kuwait for war damages. Hussein also had to destroy all chemical and biological weapons, as well as the facilities that might produce nuclear weapons. In March of 1991, the Shiites in Southern Iraq and in the Kurdish areas in the north rebelled and opposed The Iraqi government. As a result, Hussein began air attacks against these rebels. In August, 1992, the U.N. had to step in to protect the Shiites. Allied planes patrolled this area, and the allies placed a "no fly zone" for Iraq over Kurdish regions. In October, 1994, large numbers of Iraq troops moved to the Kuwaiti border again. The U.S. sent thousands of troops to this area, fearing another Iraqi attack. Finally in November of 1994, Hussein formally recognized the independence and boundaries of Kuwait. Hussein has been closely watched from 1996 until today. The Washington Post learned that an anti-Saddam operation by the CIA has cost $100 million dollars without reaching its goal of helping Iraqi resisters overthrow Saddam. The CIA reports that Iraqi armies are half as strong today as in 1991. Hussein is considered vulnerable but is still in control.

Sunday, November 24, 2019

Free Essays on Human Right

Human Rights The article â€Å"Human Rights as a Common Concern† by Charles R. Beitz a professor of government at Bowdoin College published in â€Å"American Political Science† review. As shown by the title of the article it is about the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the human rights of everyone in individual nation-states. â€Å"The global human rights regime is almost certainly more influential today then at any time since World War I† (Beitz 269). The rights have been influential in the U.S. the most in the last few weeks. Beitz points out international human rights as partisan standards. His fist thought is what the international recognized human rights and the five separated categories. â€Å"The rights of the person refer to life, liberty, and the security or the person; rights associated with the rule of law include equal recognition; political rights encompass freedom of expression; economic and social rights refer to and adequate standard of living; rights of communities include self-determination and protection of minority cultures† (Beitz 271). As you look at these rights that are recognized by the nation-states they look very similar to the United States Bill of Rights. After the five categories Beitz tells about the rights of the individual nation-state gives to its people, for example, the FGM in Sahelian African. The following section, Beitz discusses neutrality and paternalism. â€Å" The evident partisanship of international human rights doctrine has led some philosophers to suggest that we should distinguish between the full set of values recognized as human rights in international law and or human rights proper† (Beitz 272). He also illustrates moral codes, different moralities and global moral pluralism. He gives the example of R.J. Vincent and his book about the â€Å"core of basic rights that is common to all cultures despite the apparently divergent theories.† Beitz also gives several other exa... Free Essays on Human Right Free Essays on Human Right Human Rights The article â€Å"Human Rights as a Common Concern† by Charles R. Beitz a professor of government at Bowdoin College published in â€Å"American Political Science† review. As shown by the title of the article it is about the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the human rights of everyone in individual nation-states. â€Å"The global human rights regime is almost certainly more influential today then at any time since World War I† (Beitz 269). The rights have been influential in the U.S. the most in the last few weeks. Beitz points out international human rights as partisan standards. His fist thought is what the international recognized human rights and the five separated categories. â€Å"The rights of the person refer to life, liberty, and the security or the person; rights associated with the rule of law include equal recognition; political rights encompass freedom of expression; economic and social rights refer to and adequate standard of living; rights of communities include self-determination and protection of minority cultures† (Beitz 271). As you look at these rights that are recognized by the nation-states they look very similar to the United States Bill of Rights. After the five categories Beitz tells about the rights of the individual nation-state gives to its people, for example, the FGM in Sahelian African. The following section, Beitz discusses neutrality and paternalism. â€Å" The evident partisanship of international human rights doctrine has led some philosophers to suggest that we should distinguish between the full set of values recognized as human rights in international law and or human rights proper† (Beitz 272). He also illustrates moral codes, different moralities and global moral pluralism. He gives the example of R.J. Vincent and his book about the â€Å"core of basic rights that is common to all cultures despite the apparently divergent theories.† Beitz also gives several other exa...

Thursday, November 21, 2019

Economic opinion Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Economic opinion - Essay Example In the book it is concluded that owners of private equity reduce more jobs than the other firms, however, the net impact is minimal and following a private company taking over a firm, it their people who take over as directors who fare bad in terms of retention of jobs. Also according to the book, research shows that wages decrease in a span of two years following the private-equity buyouts even though there is an increase in productivity. This proposes that financial profits from high output are being changed into returns for owners instead of salary hits for the workers. Also, whereas some private-equity companies market themselves to be union friendly, some are unfriendly and still others are opposed (Weber 1). According to the authors of the book cited in the article, there are a number of things that distinguish the private-equity companies from those that are traded publicly. One is that such companies have great amounts of debts. Approximately, privately equity companies run with approximately 70 percent debt and 30 percent equity. This ratio is basically reversed by the public firms which has approximately 30 percent of to their capital from bonds, as well as other liabilities (Weber 1). The article also states that whereas the inventors in the public companies are mostly distinct from those who manage the company, the private-equity owners are the ones who manage the companies despite being the investors. This builds incentives for the owners manage the operational decisions for the short-term profits to the owners. Partly owing to this, the private-equity companies are most expected to file for liquidation as compared to the public companies, which result to notable loss of jobs at the individual firms (Weber 1). Private equity as a type of organization has its basis in venture capital. The type that is most common is the leveraged buyout (LBO) and this is the one that is under challenge. The